EPP, PES, ALDE and the others: The European parties (for a complete list see here)
could be the key for a representative democracy on the European level, but up to now they are hardly present in the public debate. Which role should they play in the EU in future, and what is necessary to achieve this? In a series of guest articles, representatives from politics and science answer here to this question. Today: Sir Graham Watson. (To the start of the series.)
- “The establishment of full-fledged and mature Pan-European parties is essential to facilitate democratic standards on the European political platform.”
As someone who has been active in European
politics for twenty years, one of my convictions has always been that
European political parties must provide a more direct link in
connecting EU-level democracy with the Union’s citizens. This has
to be seen as the number one antidote to the EU’s ever-haunting
problem of democratic legitimacy, which manifests itself in such
worrying tendencies as the steadily declining voter turnout ever
since the first direct elections to the European Parliament in 1979,
and in the rise of Euroscepticism across the continent on both ends
of the political spectrum.
Political vacuum
The lack of widely-recognised parties at EU-level
and the limited legal powers vested in them, is a substantial reason
why the EU and its institutions have been losing
public support over the past thirty-six years. Amidst the political
vacuum created by the neglect of party politics on the European
platform, what remains is for national leaders to jump in to claim
credit for all the EUʼs successful policies and to blame Brussels
for all its failures. And if the EU is presented to the citizen as
nothing more than a battle of wills between its member states it will
never inspire.
We require full-blown and mature Pan-European
parties that are sufficiently empowered by the EU’s legal structure
to move beyond the national blame games and political apathy on part
of the average citizen facilitated by lack of sufficient democratic
opportunity. Europarties have to fulfil the near same role on the
European level that political parties have hitherto only done so in
the national context.
Supranational challenges require supranational
democracy
Ever since the 19th
century, the nation state has been designated as the appropriate unit
of political governance. Thus, in the traditional context, political
parties have been predominantly active on the level of nations;
forming the transmission belt between citizens and the state. Their
role was, and still is, to organise and structure political dialogue
in society, and to nourish democracy through the availability of
choices; by offering alternative visions of the future to the
electorate.
As we have now recognised that the challenges we
face in the 21th century –ushered in by globalisation and the
physical limits of our planet– are of a supranational nature that
no national government institution has the capacity to effectively
respond to alone, the organisation of political activity on regional
and global level is rapidly taking over as the new appropriate unit
of political governance. However, this increasing predicament that
concentrates political responses to the supranational level in turn
raises burning questions about the development of supranational
democracy.
The EU’s pioneering role
As the European Union is the most advanced
institution of supranational cooperation in the world, it has a
pioneering role in institutionalising those democratic principles and
practises on the supranational level that we adhere to in a national
context. Its institutional architecture has to be based on an
efficiently functioning democratic system in which its citizens are
fully engaged and can express their political will. The success of
the whole European Project depends on this.
In order to create this direct link between the EU’s political
institutions and the public opinion of its citizens, supranational
party-politics has to play a much greater role. Just as how the role
of national political parties is indispensable to an effectively
functioning democratic state, the establishment of full-fledged and
mature Pan-European parties is essential to facilitate the same
democratic standards on the European political platform.
Reforms of internal party structures and of the legal architecture
This sentiment is now also recognised in
the EU treaties:
“Political parties at European level
contribute to forming European political awareness and to expressing
the will of citizens of the Union”.
However, in order for europarties to be fully able to tend to their
roles in fostering European democracy, a combination of internal and
external changes is needed– crucial reforms both within their party
structures, and outside in the legal architecture of the European
Union that regulates their functioning. Development in either of
these domains can help increasing the visibility and political role
of europarties, and stimulate change in the other, as it has been the
case historically.
In amplifying the role of party-political
coordination on a European level, liberals have always played a
pioneering role ever since they first insisted in the Common Assembly
of the European Coal and Steel Community, that they would all sit
together rather than in national delegations. The ALDE party
continues to honour this trail-blazing tradition by pushing for
reforms both within its own ranks, and in the EU’s political
institutions to change the governing legal framework.
More coordination among decision-makers
One of the ways in which we as a party can
continue to develop is to facilitate more coordination among our
leading European liberal decision-makers active in the various
institutions of the EU. When I was Leader of the Liberal Democrats in
the European Parliament, I started regular meetings between European
Commissioners from the Liberal family and our leading parliamentary
spokespeople. I took part in the first meetings of the Liberal
Democrat prime ministers before European Council meetings. I
organised the first of the annual weekend retreats for Europeʼs
Liberal leaders. We have come a long way then.
By today, it has been a regular practise for the
ALDE party to host the liberal Prime Ministers, European
Commissioners, and the leader of our Parliamentary group in Brussels
for a joint coordination session before every Summit of the European
Council. Moreover, we have recently extended this practise to Council
configuration meetings as well. Last December, the ALDE party has
hosted its first ever Transport and Telecommunications Pre-Council
meeting, by getting liberal national Ministers, European
Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament with the
relevant portfolio around the same table to align their positions on
a range of important policy issues.
The facilitation of these forums for coordination
and the creation of regular channels of interaction between European
liberal policy-makers play an essential role in tightening the
liberal political family in the EU; unifying its goals and vision. It
remains a crucial task of the ALDE party to further deepen and
institutionalise such interlinkages, while continuing to explore
other avenues of innovation with which we can move beyond where any
other europarty dares to move.
Voting rights for individual members
One such avenue was when in 2011, the ALDE party
has uniquely introduced the category of individual membership, which
made it possible for any EU citizen to join the party without the
prerequisite of belonging to one of our member parties on the
national level. Over the course of the past five years, we continued
to significantly develop this ground-breaking program –
establishing its own coordinating structure, headed by a Steering
Committee, that had integrated individual members more closely into
the daily work of the party.
Our commitment to delegate progressively more and
more roles and responsibilities to them culminated at our last
ALDE Party Congress, held in Budapest,
where individual members were granted voting rights. They are now
able to vote on and submit their own statutory changes and
resolutions. Bringing them to an equal footing with our member
parties in this way is a significant milestone in the enduring vision
of the ALDE party to transform from a network of liberal parties in
to a fully-fledged European political party.
External recognition
This and other parallel efforts to increase the
vitality of europarties is stimulating more external recognition from
a range of political institutions and actors. On my initiative,
former European Commission president, José Manuel Barroso (PSD/EPP)
established a regular twice yearly meeting with the political leaders
of europarties, while previously the President had met only with the
leaders of the Parliamentary political groups. President Jean-Claude
Juncker (CSV/EPP) has continued this tradition.
Another example is that five years ago the
Communist Party of the Peopleʼs Republic of China moved to set up a
China-EU Political Partiesʼ
Forum. This suggests that europarties have increasingly become more
and more recognised, even outside the border of the EU. Developments
like these demonstrate the power that is in each Europarty’s hand
to induce political change in the right direction.
Legal and institutional reforms
While there are certainly more things that we can
do to increase our own visibility and significance in the political
life of the EU –and the ALDE party is committed to make full use of
whatever is within our reach– there are certain legal limitations
imposed on us by EU law, which restrain the available scope of
development. This is why it is necessary to also push for more
structural reforms in the realm of the EU institutions, such as the
Parliament, the Commission and the Council.
Institutional changes in the EU treaties show a positive tendency in empowering party-political activity, ever since the Maastricht Treaty first made a reference to europarties in 1992. In 2003 (in Regulation (EC) 2004/2003) the EU adopted a European political party statue by defining what a “political party at European level” is, and by setting out laws concerning their funding. And indeed while several successive legislations have provided for the growing importance of europarties, yet more is needed. The fully required legal architecture to deliver a direct link between the EU’s political institutions and the “political will of the citizens of the Union” is still in need of development.
Reforming the European electoral law
An integral element of this task is the proper
reformation of the European Electoral Law, which, being adopted in
1976, is sorely outdated. Currently, European elections consist not
of one election to one parliament held simultaneously across our
continent, but of 28 different national elections spread over four
days in the same week.
Despite the ALDE Party’s sincerest efforts to
ambitiously move forward on the issue, reforming the European
electoral law was on a standstill for many years in the EU
institutions due to a lack of unified political will. Recently
however, the issue of electoral reform has resurfaced on the agenda.
On 5 February 2015, the Parliamentary Committee on Constitutional
Affairs (AFCO) gave green light for the drafting of a report on the
reform of the European Electoral Law, appointing Danuta Hübner
(PO/EPP) and Jo Leinen (SPD/PES) as co-rapporteurs. Their report was
tabled by AFCO for debate in plenary in October 2015 and was
successfully adopted on 11 November 2015 by the Parliament.
Transnational lists
The AFCO co-rapporteurs in their report have
called for a number of important changes to the 1976 Electoral Act,
such as the enhancement of the visibility of European political
parties by placing their names and logos on the ballot papers and
posters in the election campaigns; introduction of obligatory
threshold for the allocation of seats in single-constituency Member
States; closing of polls in all Member States at the same time;
introduction of a common deadline for the establishment of national
lists and the nomination of lead candidates; and harmonising the
voting age at 16 years. It will be now up to the Council to agree to
the Parliament’s proposal and adopt its own decision on the matter.
Our opinion at the ALDE party is that the proposed
measures are still too modest in scope, yet we nevertheless welcome
it as an important step in the right direction, while continuing to
push for more far-reaching reforms. We make the case that in order to
truly create an EU-level democracy, we have to elect MEPs partially
on a transnational list by a single constituency. And while this is
unlikely any time soon, I would not exclude the possibility down the
road of a Council agreement to elect a small percentage of MEPs in
this way. The creation of a truly uniform electoral system, with
partially supranational features such as a transnational list, is
vital to bring European political parties closer to citizens. Thus
the ALDE party will continue to strive towards this reform.
Sir Graham Watson was Member of the European Parliament from 1994 to 2014, leader of the ALDE Group in the European Parliament from 2002 to 2009 and president of the ALDE Party from 2011 to 2015.
|
The Future of the European Parties
1: Serienauftakt [DE]
2: Europäische Parteien: Von der Radnabe zum Netzwerk [DE] ● Reinhard Bütikofer
3: Europarties: up and growing or in decline? [DE / EN] ● Isabelle Hertner
4: On the Future Role of Europarties [DE / EN] ● Sir Graham Watson
5: Die europäischen Parteien als Verteidiger des europäischen Gemeinwohls [DE] ● Joseph Daul
6: Cocktail party or political party? On the future of the Pan-European parties [DE / EN] ● Julie Cantalou
7: « Il est naïf de penser que seules les directions de partis peuvent faire évoluer le débat vers plus d’Europe » [DE / FR] ● Gabriel Richard-Molard
8: Los partidos europeos y los límites y potenciales de Europa [DE / ES] ● Mar Garcia Sanz
9: Europarties – plentiful under-researched diamonds in the rough [DE / EN] ● Michael Kaeding and Niko Switek
10: Fédéraliser les partis d’une même famille politique [DE / FR] ● Pierre Jouvenat
1: Serienauftakt [DE]
2: Europäische Parteien: Von der Radnabe zum Netzwerk [DE] ● Reinhard Bütikofer
3: Europarties: up and growing or in decline? [DE / EN] ● Isabelle Hertner
4: On the Future Role of Europarties [DE / EN] ● Sir Graham Watson
5: Die europäischen Parteien als Verteidiger des europäischen Gemeinwohls [DE] ● Joseph Daul
6: Cocktail party or political party? On the future of the Pan-European parties [DE / EN] ● Julie Cantalou
7: « Il est naïf de penser que seules les directions de partis peuvent faire évoluer le débat vers plus d’Europe » [DE / FR] ● Gabriel Richard-Molard
8: Los partidos europeos y los límites y potenciales de Europa [DE / ES] ● Mar Garcia Sanz
9: Europarties – plentiful under-researched diamonds in the rough [DE / EN] ● Michael Kaeding and Niko Switek
10: Fédéraliser les partis d’une même famille politique [DE / FR] ● Pierre Jouvenat
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen
Kommentare sind hier herzlich willkommen und werden nach der Sichtung freigeschaltet. Auch wenn anonyme Kommentare technisch möglich sind, ist es für eine offene Diskussion hilfreich, wenn Sie Ihre Beiträge mit Ihrem Namen kennzeichnen. Um einen interessanten Gedankenaustausch zu ermöglichen, sollten sich Kommentare außerdem unmittelbar auf den Artikel beziehen und möglichst auf dessen Argumentation eingehen. Bitte haben Sie Verständnis, dass Meinungsäußerungen ohne einen klaren inhaltlichen Bezug zum Artikel hier in der Regel nicht veröffentlicht werden.